The Civil War Part 2: Crash Course US History #21

The Civil War Part 2: Crash Course US History #21

†CCUS 21 – The Civil War Part 2
Hi, I’m John Green; this is Crash Course U.S. history and today we return to…wait,
what are we talking about today, Stan? Ah, the Civil War! I can tell because Lincoln’s
here. But this week we’re not gonna talk about
casualty counts or battles or its generals with their heroic and probably fictional dying
declarations. Mr. Green, Mr. Green, wait did that one guy
not really say “Honeybun how do I look in the face?” because that was the best part
of this whole class. Jeb Stewart did say that, Me from the Past,
but it probably wasn’t his last words, but anyway today we’re going to try to focus
on what’s really important. In the end the really vital stuff isn’t,
like, Pickett’s Charge or Lee saying “It is well that war is so terrible – otherwise
we would grow too fond of it” or the surrender at the Appomattox Court House.
That stuff matters and I don’t want to deny it, but the Civil War and the way we remember
it is still shaping the world today, and that’s what I want to focus on, because it’s the
stuff that might actually change the way you think about your own life in your own country,
whether it’s the United States or the Green Parts of Not America.
intro So let’s start with one of the big questions
historians still ask about the Civil War: Did Lincoln free the slaves? The answer, as
with so much here on Crashcourse is yes … and also no. Let’s go straight to the Thought
Bubble today. So Lincoln’s reputation as the Great Emancipator
rests largely on his Emancipation Proclamation, an executive order which went into effect
on January 1, 1863. This order ostensibly freed all the slaves in territory currently
rebelling against the United States, i.e. in areas where the U.S. government had no
authority to free slaves. This is rather like the United States announcing that from here
on out, North Korea will be ruled by Lady Gaga. Sure, it’s a great idea, but it’s
not really your jurisdiction. In areas where the U.S. did have the authority
to free slaves, the border states and some of the areas of the Confederacy that had been
effectively conquered and occupied by federal troops, those slaves were NOT freed. So Lincoln
didn’t free the slaves that he actually had the power to free.
Many historians argue that, in fact, slaves freed themselves. How? By running away to
union lines and becoming “contrabands.” Because this was a time of war and slaves
were seen as a valuable resource to the enemy, when they escaped and sought refuge with Union
troops, Union commanders wouldn’t give them back, despite fugitive slave laws still being
on the books. So many slaves escaped, the argument goes,
that Lincoln was basically forced to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, because until
he did so, those contraband slaves were still technically property of their Southern masters,
and the Union generals were breaking American laws by not returning them. The Emancipation
Proclamation then had the added bonus of encouraging more slaves to come over to the Union lines,
many of whom joined the army, which eventually included about 180,000 former slaves and free
black men. Thanks, Thought Bubble. So Lincoln may also
have issued the proclamation in order to shift the focus of the war from union to slavery
to prevent the British from recognizing the Confederacy.
Arguably the Confederacy’s best chance to win the Civil War was to get some kind of
foreign patron, and Britain was the likeliest choice as it was very dependent on Confederate
textiles. But as you’ll remember from all those people
going to Canada, Britain had already abolished slavery and it was the historic source of
abolitionist sentiment, and so it was very shrewd of Lincoln to make the war about slavery.
Off-topic, but if I may put on my world historian hat for a moment. Thank you, Stan. The fact
that the British did not recognize the South had profound effects on the whole world, because
it meant that the British shifted their focus to Egypt and India as sources of cotton for
their textile mills. All that noted, I think Lincoln does deserve
some credit for freeing the slaves for two reasons.
First, he pushed for the Thirteenth amendment which actually ended slavery in the United
States. And perhaps more importantly, he continued
the war to its conclusion and demanded that the end of slavery and the return of the Southern
states to the Union be conditions for peace. This may seem obvious today, but in 1864 it
wasn’t. In fact, there were numerous calls in the
North for an end to the war that would allow the South to exist as a separate country and
leave slavery intact. Now, of course, the rest of world history
indicates that at some point slavery would have ended, but by prosecuting the war to
its end, Lincoln brought about slavery’s end sooner.
But the Civil War didn’t just end slavery. If it had gone differently, Me from the Past
might have been annoying teachers in a different country from the one in which I now live.
I might’ve need a passport to visit my parents in North Carolina and slavery might have survived
for decades–Brazil didn’t fully abolish slavery until 1888.
And the south would be covered in green as part of Not-America. Or, the north, depending
on where you’re watching this video, I guess. And, the people who lived through the Civil
War knew it was momentous. In his famous Gettysburg Address, Abraham Lincoln fostered the idea
that the Civil War was a kind of second American Revolution, or at least a culmination and
reaffirmation of the first one. “From these honored dead we take increased
devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion–that we
here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation,
under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people,
for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” We tried to hire Daniel Day-Lewis for that,
but he was unavailable. That phrase “new birth” of freedom had
religious significance as well because it was, like, the 19th century equivalent to
“born again.” So, the Civil War was the first modern war
in terms of its scale and its destruction. Like, others have waged war on civilians to
break the spirit of their enemies (STAN! Mongoltage OPPORTUNITY!)
mongoltage But new technologies made this one of the
most destructive wars yet recorded. And, yes, I know the Taiping rebellion took more lives,
and in terms of percentage of population killed, the contemporaneous war in Paraguay was worse,
but bear with me. Rifles, and toward the end of the Civil War,
machine guns shifted the way that people fight. It became easier to defend a line, so cavalry
charges and huge waves of attacks started to be just slaughtery although it would take
World War I for the rest of the world to figure that out.
And the incredible numbers of dead and wounded really changed Americans’ relationship with
death itself. Like, the Gettysburg address was given to
dedicate a new national cemetery, and the Civil War helped to create a culture of meditation
on mortality itself that led to cemeteries replacing churchyards as the final resting
places for most Americans. And the sight of slaughter and the sheer weight
of it had profound existential effects on a generation of American intellectuals from
Walt Whitman and Oliver Wendell Holmes. Oh, it’s time for the Mystery Document?
The rules here are simple. I guess the Mystery Document and usually I
am shocked. Oh my gosh, today’s Mystery Document is on an iPad!
This appears to be a photograph of wounded soldiers in hospital. I’m gonna go ahead
and call it as being by Mathew Brady. What? I already got it? But I didn’t get
to say the name… Oh, it’s called Wounded Soldiers in Hospital.
Thank you for an easy one, Stan. So, Mathew Brady was a prolific photographer
during the Civil War, although, like a lot of prolific people, he often took credit for
work done by his employees. And Brady really changed the way that people thought about
war. He and his staff created some 10,000 images
during the Civil War. And it was the first time that an event had been photographically
documented so thoroughly. By the way, lest you think that the unreliability
of images began with Photoshop, many of Brady’s photographs were staged.
He would move bodies, sometimes soldiers were apparently told to act dead.
But of course, at the time, photographs felt inherently authentic and written accounts
of battles could now be accompanied by actual images of the fighting and its aftermath.
But, perhaps the most important impact of the Civil War was the new nation that it created.
Like, the American Civil War fits right in with the global phenomenon of nation-building
that was happening. Soon we would have places on the map like
Italy and Germany, and older places like Greece would be re-born as nation states. And then
all of these places would be known to Americans as Not-America.
But, by the way, congratulations to Italy on the recent election of their 732nd Prime
Minister in just 180 years of existing. By far, the most successful of these new nation
states were the ones that embraced industrialization and modern ideas of organization and centralized
government. Northern victory in the Civil War meant the
United States would follow the path that the North laid down. It would become an industrial
rather than agrarian nation, with a national government pre-eminent over those of individual
states. It would become a nation. And its not a coincidence that over the course
of the 19th century, people stopped pluralizing the United States; they stopped saying, “The
United States are a great place to live,” and began saying, “The United States is
a great place to live.” The Civil War helped singularize what had been until then a plural
nation. And Abraham Lincoln was the first president
to truly expand the power of the executive. He ordered blockades and suspended habeas
corpus, in addition to emancipating the slaves. But the Republican dominated congress played
a role in this federalization too. Congress passed the Homestead Act in 1862
that encouraged settlement of the west by basically giving away land to anyone who had
$18 and was willing to live on it and farm it for five years.
Downside: you have to live in Oklahoma. Unless of course you’re an American Indian in which
case, downside: you don’t get to live in Oklahoma anymore.
You may be wondering, how were we able to sell all of this land so cheap? It’s because
we stole it! Meanwhile, the Morrill Land Grant Act financed
colleges to offer training in new scientific agricultural techniques. The Department of
Agriculture was created to generate statistics and share best practices in farming.
Congress also helped unify the country with the massive land grants in the Pacific Railway
Act of 1862. And during the war the Lincoln administration
gave away 158 million acres to railroads to tie the nation together. Get it? Tie? Railroad
ties? The nation toge-? I’ll take my coat and go.
Plus, as you may have noticed, wars are expensive. And in order to finance the Civil War, Congress
passed the first progressive income tax in American history, as well as floating huge
bond issues to the public. And when that wasn’t enough, the administration
began printing federal money on green paper called “greenbacks.” These, along with
notes issued by banks under the National Bank Act of 1863 became the first national currency
in the United States. Altogether, the total cost of the war for
the Union was $6.7 billion. Interestingly, if in 1860 the federal government had purchased
every slave and granted a 40-acre farm to each family, the total cost would have been
$3.1 billion. But a) it would have been hard to get that
bill through Congress, and b) at the time the federal government had no way to raise
that kind of money. The federal government also actively promoted
the industrial economy that was to become dominant in the United States after the war.
In fact, industrialization was so healthy that visitors to cities in the North during
the Civil War would have been hard pressed to notice that they were even in a war.
So, ultimately, the Civil War was a victory for Alexander Hamilton’s federalist vision
of what America should be. I mean, Thomas Jefferson could never have
imagined the United States that emerged from the Civil War, a government that supported
an army of a million men, carried a $2.5 billion national debt, distributed public lands, printed
a national currency, and collected an array of internal taxes. It sounds like Britain!
So, the Civil War wasn’t just a victory of North over South or of freedom over slavery.
It created the nation that the United States of America has become. Thanks for watching.
I’ll see you next week. Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan
Muller. Our script supervisor is Meredith Danko. Too far! Our associate producer is
Danica Johnson. The show is written by my high school history teacher, Raoul Meyer,
and myself. And our graphics team is Thought Café.
Every week, there’s a new caption for the Libertage. You can suggest some in comments
where you can also ask questions about today’s video that will be answered by our team of
historians. Thank you for watching and as we say in my hometown, don’t forget to be
awesome. Civil War 2 –


  1. Post
  2. Post
  3. Post
    Brad Watson

    The Civil War wasn't all about slavery. In 1861, Southern plantation owners owed a billion dollar$ to New York City  banks and the cotton market in NYC took 40% of profits. Like with their ancestors in the Revolutionary War who owed million$ to London banks and avoided paying, in 1861, Southern plantation owners saw the Civil War as a way to avoid paying their debts.

  4. Post
  5. Post
  6. Post
  7. Post
  8. Post
  9. Post
  10. Post

    The only thing I really hate about our country is how people get really confused about what the meaning of the first amendment actually is.

  11. Post
    Richard Blankenship

    So if all those soldiers from Michigan could see how Detroit turned out, do you think they would have still fought?

  12. Post
  13. Post
  14. Post
  15. Post
  16. Post
  17. Post
  18. Post
  19. Post
  20. Post
  21. Post
  22. Post

    Sure, it was a war about morals. Then immediately after destroying the southern economy and railroads, immediately black Confederate soldiers are freed from rock island prisons to become buffalo soldiers and go murder Indians…because morals.
    Lincoln embargoed SC because they declared independence. as he stated multiple times "to preserve the union at all costs". The Northern trust had corrupt politicians in their pockets and the south paid majority taxes (because taxation was on exports). New states were free states thus forever weakening the southern political positions in congress.
    You know the north had copperheads and the south had know-nothings. Very few people owned slaves. More white croppers despised the slaves because they couldn't live off the wages due to slave competition.
    In 1862 (during the war) freemont liberated slaves and Lincoln sent them back to their masters.
    "Slavery" morals because an argument to prevent Europeans from siding with the confederacy who produced their cash crops.

  23. Post
  24. Post
    Saundra Wills

    It was all about💵💰💰,and u know that. The south was rich and North wanted 2 rule.south said No,there for the north took over.

  25. Post
  26. Post
  27. Post
    Aliah Olmo Jimenez

    Saludos Desde Puerto Rico. Ps thanks for the super helpful videos trust me I never would have graduated middle school if it wasn't for these.

  28. Post
  29. Post
  30. Post
  31. Post
  32. Post
  33. Post
    Jon Stitzel

    OK, I like most of these videos, but I have one correction on this one. Nobody surrendered in THE Appomattox Court House. The name of the little town was Appomattox Court House.

  34. Post
  35. Post
    짜장면 먹은 냥냥이

    AHAHAHAHA I DIED when he said that freeing the slaves in rebelling states was like the US proclaiming that North Korea will now be ruled by Lady Gaga

  36. Post
  37. Post
  38. Post
  39. Post
  40. Post
  41. Post
  42. Post
  43. Post
    Rosamund Powell

    Lincoln DID NOT have the power to free those slaves in the border states still in the Union. Not in 1861, 1862 or 1863. The U.S. Constitution still protected slavery . . . even during the war. Britain and other European countries were also dependent upon Northern wheat and corn. Probably even more so than Southern cotton. Europeans had been dependent upon American wheat and corn for several decades. Matters were made worse, due to crop failures that plagued Western Europe during the early 1860s.

  44. Post
  45. Post
  46. Post
    Froehlig Girlz

    "… and the way we remember it." I had a football coach for my high school US history course, at 8 a.m. He showed film strips. We all slept. As a white woman, this to me seems the classic conservative argument against public education.

    You can bet your hiney I can run in heels.

  47. Post
  48. Post
    Jonathan C

    One interesting aspect of the end of the Civil War was that many Confederate leaders, including Jefferson Davis, wanted to take to the hills and continue the war as a guerrilla action. It is interesting that the army commanders and Secretary of War generally did not support this idea, and in fact the Civil War had a curiously peaceable ending. In the end, for Southerners, slavery and independence were not worth continuing a losing battle.

  49. Post
  50. Post
    Anthony Montague

    I honestly believe slavery would still be around if the Confederacy ever really became their own country. The South had to be forced into ending Segregation and even now they try and suppress the rights of minorities within their borders whenever possible.

  51. Post
  52. Post
  53. Post
  54. Post
    Luke Brooks

    U are a massive cock summer… I am a massive British man,.,.. I hope u. Have a massive case of the not sleepies.,..

  55. Post

    Although the British didn't officially recognize the Confederacy, they did provide material support for it. There are literally books written about Britain's involvement in the American Civil War.

  56. Post

    The comment that Lincoln did not free salves in Union occupied areas of the South is not absolutely true. The Union didn't liberate them by force, but they were allowed to just leave on their own accord. Sherman's march through the South and the fall of Richmond are a couple of ready examples.

  57. Post
  58. Post
  59. Post
    George George

    I happen to live in the "green parts of non America" and I do completely recognise how important the US civil war and it's results were going forwards.
    It's a shame that the current US president is what he is..however it is not the first shameful US presidency..creating world conflicts and manufacturing "truths" in order to invade countries for private gains.

  60. Post
  61. Post
  62. Post
  63. Post

    I love youtube, but the idea that its not-algorithm can't understand that episode #22 comes after #21 is mind-boggling. Thanks google. This is why Patreon exists.

  64. Post
    Melancholy Zhane

    Well I didn't get 1:44, aren't rebelling states defeated and thus submissive to the government? Or is it referring to before the war ends?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *